Azumo vs Belitsoft: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Azumo (4.3/5) edges ahead of Belitsoft (3.8/5) overall. Azumo is the better choice for uS companies that want nearshore-priced engineering with named framework expertise in LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen.. Belitsoft is the stronger option for healthcare, fintech, and e-learning companies wanting agentic AI from a vendor with existing vertical experience.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Azumo vs Belitsoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Azumo | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2004 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 51–200 | 51–400 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | US companies that want nearshore-priced engineering with named framework expertise in LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen. | Healthcare, fintech, and e-learning companies wanting agentic AI from a vendor with existing vertical experience. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangGraph, CrewAI | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare | Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS |
Azumo vs Belitsoft: overview
Azumo
Azumo is a nearshore software development firm founded in 2016 and headquartered in San Francisco, with roughly 110 employees spread across South America, North America, and Asia. It explicitly builds production-grade agentic systems using LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen, coordinating multiple models and tools to complete multi-step business processes for enterprise clients. Its nearshore staffing model trades some of the premium of onshore-only teams for time-zone-aligned delivery, without the larger enterprise support apparatus of bigger SIs.
Belitsoft
Belitsoft is a custom software development company founded in 2004 with headquarters in Warsaw, Poland and delivery teams distributed across Poland, Latvia, and Georgia, totaling roughly 130–400 developers, testers, and other specialists depending on the source. It serves industries including e-learning, healthcare, fintech, and — more recently — artificial intelligence and agent development. Reported employee counts vary significantly by source, so buyers should confirm current team size directly before committing to a large program.
Services and capabilities: Azumo vs Belitsoft
| Capability | Azumo | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Azumo vs Belitsoft
| Framework / platform | Azumo | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | N/A | ✓ |
| LangGraph | ✓ | N/A |
| AutoGen | ✓ | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Azumo vs Belitsoft
| Criterion | Azumo | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Azumo vs Belitsoft
| Dimension | Azumo | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services | Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents for a business process, Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Healthcare or fintech companies building compliance-aware agentic workflows, E-learning platforms adding AI tutoring or advisory agents |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Azumo vs Belitsoft: pros and cons
| Azumo | |
|---|---|
| + | Named, current expertise across three major multi-agent orchestration frameworks |
| + | Nearshore staffing (South/North America) keeps time zones aligned with US clients |
| + | ~110-person team stays small enough for direct engineering access without large-SI layers |
| + | Founded 2016 with a decade of nearshore delivery track record |
| - | Smaller team than the global systems integrators limits very large concurrent programs |
| - | Public enterprise-scale compliance certifications are less documented than at bigger competitors |
| - | Delivery model depends on continued nearshore talent availability across multiple countries |
| Belitsoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Two decades of vertical delivery experience in healthcare, fintech, and e-learning |
| + | Multi-country delivery team (Poland, Latvia, Georgia) gives some staffing flexibility |
| + | Founded 2004 with continuous operating history |
| + | Existing sector expertise helps agent work meet vertical-specific compliance and workflow needs |
| - | Reported employee counts vary widely across sources (roughly 127 to 400), worth confirming directly |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer addition to a generalist custom-software practice |
| - | Fewer public large-enterprise references than bigger competitors on this list |
Who should choose Azumo?
Azumo is the right choice for uS companies that want nearshore-priced engineering with named framework expertise in LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen..
Explicit, named production experience with LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen for multi-agent orchestration.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare.
Who should choose Belitsoft?
Belitsoft is the right choice for healthcare, fintech, and e-learning companies wanting agentic AI from a vendor with existing vertical experience..
Two decades of vertical experience in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech, applied to agent development in those same sectors.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Azumo vs Belitsoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Belitsoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Azumo |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Azumo |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Azumo |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Azumo vs Belitsoft
| Use case | Azumo fit | Belitsoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building multi-agent systems that coordinate across CrewAI or AutoGen agents for a business process | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Extending an internal engineering team with nearshore agentic AI capacity | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or fintech companies building compliance-aware agentic workflows | Limited | Strong | Belitsoft |
| E-learning platforms adding AI tutoring or advisory agents | Limited | Strong | Belitsoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Azumo vs Belitsoft
Azumo (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. Explicit, named production experience with LangGraph, CrewAI, and Microsoft AutoGen for multi-agent orchestration.. It is best for uS companies that want nearshore-priced engineering with named framework expertise in LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen..
Belitsoft (3.8/5) is the better choice when healthcare, fintech, and e-learning companies wanting agentic AI from a vendor with existing vertical experience.. If your situation matches those criteria, Belitsoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Azumo vs Belitsoft FAQ
Is Azumo better than Belitsoft?
Azumo (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Azumo is better for uS companies that want nearshore-priced engineering with named framework expertise in LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen.. Belitsoft is better for healthcare, fintech, and e-learning companies wanting agentic AI from a vendor with existing vertical experience..
How do Azumo and Belitsoft differ in pricing?
Azumo uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Belitsoft uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Azumo or Belitsoft?
Belitsoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Azumo and Belitsoft?
Azumo's primary differentiator is: explicit, named production experience with langgraph, crewai, and microsoft autogen for multi-agent orchestration.. Belitsoft's primary differentiator is: two decades of vertical experience in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech, applied to agent development in those same sectors.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 51–400), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Healthcare, Financial Services).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.